In re McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the preponderance-of-evidence standard and rejecting the lawyer’s assertion that the standard should be proof beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lenihan v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-05-27· cited 22×
• Paul J. Walwyn v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of Tennessee
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-12-03· cited 18×
• La firma profesional de López de Tord & Zayas Pizarro v. Molina
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1928-11-26· cited 18×
• Louisville Bar Ass'n v. Hubbard
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1940-02-16· cited 7×
• Denny v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1917-05-01· cited 7×
• Stanley v. Bird
  W.D. Kentucky· 1949-08-13· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Porter
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1932-02-26· cited 6×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Buckingham v. Ward
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1937-03-09· cited 6×
• López de Tord & Zayas Pizarro v. Molina
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1928-11-26

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Crum
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-04-21· cited 10×
• Wilson v. Popham
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1891-03-12· cited 4×