In re McCurdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that amended petition did not relate back because “[t]he issue of whether the drug amounts were correctly determined at [defendant]'s sentencing is unrelated to the issue of whether his appellate counsel was ineffective”
• explaining that “[a] party cannot amend a § 2255 petition to add a completely new claim after the statute of limitations has expired”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).