· 2/12/1988
In Re McCormick Management Co., Inc.
Citations
- 547 A.2d 1319
- 149 Vt. 585
- 1988 Vt. LEXIS 82
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting developer's argument that it obtained vested development rights by filing its subdivision plat before enactment of local zoning ordinance
- rejecting developer’s argument that it obtained vested development rights by filing its subdivision plat before enactment of local zoning ordinance
- where “the legislature has dictated how th[e] policy considerations should apply,” the Smith rule does not control
- goal of zoning is to eliminate nonconforming uses; rules that protect preexisting small lots in affiliated ownership undermine that legislative policy
- construe statutes that are part of same overall scheme in pari materia
- a goal of zoning is to eliminate nonconforming uses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Peck, Dooley, Mahady, Keyser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.