In Re McCann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the plain language of section 586(e)(2) clearly requires the trustee to collect the statutory ‘percentage fee from all payments received by such individual’”
• “To find that Fulkrod correctly interpreted these sections as barring all direct payments by the debtor would place this Court in the position of ignoring clear congressional intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Knudsen v. Internal Revenue Service
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-09-16· cited 22×
• Adams v. Bostick (In Re Bostick)
  D. Connecticut· 2009-02-02· cited 14×
• Anders Knudsen v. Internal Revenue Service
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-09-16
• In re LaRosa Greenhouse, LLP
  D. New Jersey· 2017-03-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Pianowski
  W.D. Michigan· 1988-10-25· cited 35×
• Overholt v. Farm Credit Services (In Re Overholt)
  S.D. Ohio· 1990-12-11· cited 33×
• Matter of Finkbine
  S.D. Ohio· 1988-11-30· cited 17×
• In Re Bettger
  D. Oregon· 1989-09-29· cited 15×
• In Re Slaughter
  D. North Dakota· 1995-09-19· cited 9×
• In Re Teigen
  D. Montana· 1992-07-01· cited 3×
• Matter of Cross
  D. Nebraska· 1995-05-04· cited 3×