In re M.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court had temporary emergency jurisdiction pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 50A-204, the equivalent of § 30-3B-204, because the child was physically present in North Carolina and the child was subject to mistreatment
• concluding that the trial court had temporary emergency jurisdiction pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 50A-204 , the equivalent of § 30-3B-204 , because the child was physically present in North Carolina and the child was subject to mistreatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re E.X.J.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-06-17· cited 21×
• Peterson v. Peterson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2007-02-09· cited 14×
• In re: T.P., T.P.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-07-05· cited 4×
• In Re EXJ
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-06-17
• In Re MB
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-09-19
• In Re Sdh
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-12-18
• Ward v. Fogel
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2014-12-02
• In re: R.J.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07
• In re: P.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07
• In re: N.J.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07
• In re: L.T.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07
• Radiance Capital Receivables Twenty One
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-12-06
• In re: N.B. & N.W.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-07-05
• Fred Smith Co. v. Smith
  North Carolina Business Court· 2025-11-14

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Sheila L. Ex Rel. Ronald M.M. v. Ronald P.M.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-10-27· cited 15×