In re Mayhew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming examiner's rejection of claims not limited to having a cooling zone at the exit of a steel strip from a zinc bath because the specification indicated that without that cooling bath the invented process would not work
• affirming examiner’s rejection of claims not limited to having a cooling zone at the exit of a steel strip from a zinc bath because the specification indicated that without that cooling bath the invented process would not work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-03-03· cited 332×
• In re Angstadt
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1976-06-24· cited 34×
• Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1981-10-13· cited 22×
• In re Ehrreich
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-01-11· cited 16×
• Alcon, Inc. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
  D. Delaware· 2009-10-19· cited 6×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
• Application of Charles D. Prater and James Wei
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1969-08-14· cited 100×
• Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van Venrooy
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1970-03-12· cited 62×
• Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. Janoski
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-01· cited 53×
• In re Sarett
  U.S. Customs Court· 1964-02-20· cited 44×
• Application of Charles T. Fuetterer
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1963-06-28· cited 39×
• Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 1968-08-02· cited 28×
• Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. Foster
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1970-05-21· cited 22×
• Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 1966-07-06· cited 22×
• Application of Francis J. Honn and Willard M. Sims
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1966-08-04· cited 12×
• In re Conley
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1974-01-24· cited 12×
• In re Hughes
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1974-06-06· cited 10×
• In re Cormany
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-04-19· cited 9×
• Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1975-04-04· cited 9×
• Application of John F. Corr
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1965-06-24· cited 7×
• Application of Marwan R. Kamal and Edgar R. Rogier
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1968-07-03· cited 6×
• Application of Charles W. Garvin
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1968-04-04· cited 2×