Skip to main content
· 3/5/1996

In Re: Maya Construction Company, Id 86-0352941, Debtor. Alan L. Levin v. Maya Construction

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 1395
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1468
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 2513
  • 35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 630
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3738
  • 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 926
  • 1996 WL 89109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that New York applies under the current Code and finding the required notice to be a “matter of due process.”
  • finding that a party who submitted a formal written demand upon the debtor prepetition was a known creditor entitled to official notice
  • “A debtor must list a creditor whose identity and claims he knows. 11 U.S.C. § 521. The burden is on the debtor to cause formal notice to be given . 24 . . .”
  • creditor whose claim was known to debtor but who was not served with notice of the time fixed for filing objections to the plan, confirmation hearing, and other relevant notices was not bound by the confirmed plan.
  • creditor whose claim was known to debtor but who was not served with notice of the time fixed for filing objections to the plan, confirmation hearing, and other relevant notices was not bound by the confirmed plan
  • same for “formal written demand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Poole, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.