In Re Maxy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an inmate had failed to state an access-to-courts claim because he did not inform the court of the underlying legal claims frustrated by the delay that could have established a nonfrivolous, arguable claim
• concluding prisoner did not state a claim for denial of access to the courts because he did not identify a nonfrivolous, arguable claim in the underlying case at issue
• dismissing a forward-looking access-to-courts claim where the plaintiff did not identify “the underlying legal claims frustrated by the [obstacle]”
• a plaintiff \must allege that some action by the prison has frustrated or is impeding an attempt to bring a nonfrivolous legal claim.\
• a plaintiff \must allege that some action by the prison has frustrated or is impeding an attempt to bring a nonfrivolous legal claim.\
• plaintiff can state an access to courts claim by alleging that he was prevented from litigating a non-frivolous challenge to his criminal conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).