In Re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Deriv. Lit.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the complaint alleged that defendants “issued proxy statements requesting votes for their election as directors and for approval of various Stock Plans”
• “There can be no recovery 9 for reliance on representations made prior to the five-year statute of limitations period under a 10 theory of continuing wrong.”
• “The required state of mind for a § 14(a) violation is that of negligence.”
• “The required state of mind for a § 14(a) violation is that of negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).