In re Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whether the Petitioners’ crimes fall under the elements clause or the challenged residual clause is itself a merits inquiry.”
• “Whether the Petitioners’ crimes fall under the elements clause or the challenged residual clause is itself a merits inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: Dearnta Thomas
  Fourth Circuit· 2021-02-23· cited 33×
• In Re: Orlando Hall
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-10-30· cited 18×
• Christopher Jones v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 2022-07-05· cited 10×
• United States v. Mark Jordan
  Third Circuit· 2023-12-12
• United States v. Mark Jordan
  Third Circuit· 2024-03-25

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
• Johnson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
• United States v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 2019-06-24· cited 2,472×
• Felker v. Turpin
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 1,437×
• Sessions v. Dimaya
  Supreme Court· 2018-04-17· cited 942×
• Michael Pendleton v.
  Third Circuit· 2013-10-03· cited 79×
• Thomas Hoffner, Jr. v.
  Third Circuit· 2017-09-07· cited 29×
• United States v. McNeill
  Third Circuit· 2010-01-11· cited 2×