in Re: Matthew Blake Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Fessler alleged that “PowerPoint presentation [] repeatedly informed him that his commissions would be uncapped.”
• noting that Virginia law applied quantum meruit where there was a request for services but no compensation discussed, whereas unjust enrichment applied in the absence of a request and limited the remedy to the benefit received
• “Because we find 17 the dismissal of Fessler’s fraud claim was unwarranted, we also find the dismissal of his claim for punitive damages unwarranted.”
• fraud claims must be plead with particularity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).