In Re Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena. Appeal of Jay Kenton Samuelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]efendant . . . could not possibly incriminate himself in crimes for which he had been convicted.”
• “[I]f upon questioning by the grand jury a truthful response would be inconsistent with [the witness’s] trial testimony, ... [the witness] would have the right to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.”
• no Fifth Amendment privilege for answers to questions whether witness knew certain individuals
• in ineffectiveness claim, “[w]e also consider counsel’s experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).