In Re Matter of Grand Jury Applicants, C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc., Joseph J. Reinert, David Verna, David F. Herrala, Paul P. Marchese, Charles P. McDevitt and Joseph H. McDevitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the privilege holder’s employees are third-parties under Perlman because employees are unlikely to stand in contempt to protect their employer
• holding that the privilege holder’s employees are third-parties under Perlman because employees are unlikely to stand in contempt to protect their employer
• holding that the privilege holder’s employees are third-parties under Perlman because employees are unlikely to stand in contempt to protect their employer
• explaining that “the Alexander-Cobbledick-Ryan [contempt] rule restricting appellate review is limited to situations where the contempt route to a final order is available to the appellant”
• employer may appeal denial of motion brought as intervenor to quash grand jury subpoenas ad testificandum served on employees
• employer may appeal denial of motion brought as intervenor to quash grand jury sub poenas ad testificandum served on employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).