In Re Mastic Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 20 trademark applicant’s prior consent agreement was naked in affirming the USPTO’s decision to 21 deny trademark registration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. And Oxxford Clothes Xx, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-05-14· cited 115×
• Patsy's Italian Restaurant, Inc. v. Banas
  E.D. New York· 2007-08-28· cited 27×
• In Re Dr. Matthias Rath
  Federal Circuit· 2005-03-24· cited 19×
• Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes Inc
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-04-10
• Ye Mystic Krewe of Gasparilla
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2025-10-14
• Emulex Corp.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 1987-11-05
• Wacker Neuson SE
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2010-12-28
• Kent Pedersen
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2013-12-30
• Bay State Brewing Company, Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2016-02-25
• American Cruise Lines, Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2018-10-03
• Dare Foods Incorporated
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2022-03-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-05-03· cited 523×
• Bongrain International (American) Corporation v. Delice De France, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1987-02-12· cited 31×
• In Re N.A.D. Inc., Also Trading as North American Drager
  Federal Circuit· 1985-02-14· cited 17×