In Re Mary Poole, Debtor. Russell A. Brown, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Michael T. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[w]hile a lawyer is admitted into a federal court by way of a state court, he is not automatically sent out of the federal court by the same route”
• ‘[A]s nearly a century of Supreme Court precedent makes clear, practice before federal courts is not governed by state-court rules.’
• ‘[A]s nearly a century of Supreme Court precedent makes clear, practice before federal courts is not governed by state-court rules.’
• “[A]s nearly a century of Supreme Court precedent makes clear, practice before federal courts is not governed by state court rules.”
• “Admission to practice law before a state’s courts and admission to practice before the federal courts in that state are separate, independent privileges.”
• because “[t]he bankruptcy courts 26 are, of course, units of the district courts,” an attorney admitted to appear in front of 27 Arizona federal district courts can appear in Arizona bankruptcy courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).