Customs and Patent Appeals· 4/18/1956
In re Marx
Citations
- 43 C.C.P.A. 880
- 232 F.2d 638
- 109 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 378
- 1956 CCPA LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “since both patents relate to the same art, it would readily have occurred to one having cognizance of the features of the references that it might be desirable to [combine them].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Because, Cole, Connell, Hearing, Illness, Jackson, Johnson, Wokley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re FridolphCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1943-03-01· cited 30×
- Application of LindbergCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1952-02-18· cited 27×
- In re DelanceyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1949-09-30· cited 17×
- In re HorneyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1947-05-13· cited 9×
- In re StreckertCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1948-05-04· cited 7×
- Application of KamletCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1950-12-05· cited 5×
- In re WilliamsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-06-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.