· 12/21/2009
In Re Martin M.
Citations
- 221 P.3d 1058
- 223 Ariz. 244
- 572 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is not within either the trial court’s or this court’s authority to amend a statute to correct what appears to have been legislative oversight.”
- appellate court may not rewrite statute under “guise of divining legislative intent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Espinosa, Vásquez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.