Skip to main content
· 12/21/2009

In Re Martin M.

Citations

  • 221 P.3d 1058
  • 223 Ariz. 244
  • 572 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is not within either the trial court’s or this court’s authority to amend a statute to correct what appears to have been legislative oversight.”
  • appellate court may not rewrite statute under “guise of divining legislative intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Espinosa, Vásquez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.