Skip to main content

In re Martin

Citations

  • 209 Pa. 266
  • 58 A. 478
  • 1904 Pa. LEXIS 604

Syllabus

<p>Mines and mining—Removal of mine inspector—Act of June 8, 1901, P. L. 535—Appeals—Certiorari.</p> <p>There is nothing in the Act of June 8, 1901, P. L. 535, providing a summary method for removing a mine inspector for negligence or incompetency, to sustain a petition for his removal because of his .ineligibility for the appointment, or want of jurisdiction in the court appointing him, or want of co-operation and confidence of the miners.</p> <p>Ineligibility for the appointment, or want of jurisdiction of the court to appoint, are grounds for ouster on quo warranto, but not for summary deprivation of office on petition under the act.</p> <p>On appeal from an order of the court dismissing such petition the Supreme Court will consider the case as upon certiorari.</p> <p>It seems that under the Act of June 8, 1901, P. L. 535, where a mine inspector appointed by the governor resigns, the judges of the court of common pleas have jurisdiction to fill the vacancy from among applicants possessing the proper qualifications.</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, Mestbezat, Mitchell, Potteb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.