Skip to main content

In Re Martin

Citations

  • 354 P.2d 995
  • 67 N.M. 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering evidence “anew” to determine its sufficiency when reviewing a disciplinary recommendation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Carmody, Moise, Chavez, Noble

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.