In Re Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an attorney violated RPC 8.4(c) by knowingly creating fictitious real estate documents that she knew were relied on by a third party (facts set forth in DRB decision)
• attorney violated RPC 8.4(c) where she assisted her client in conduct she knew was illegal or fraudulent, and made a false statement of material fact to a third party
• attorney violated RPC 8.4(c) where she 3 assisted her client in conduct she knew was illegal or fraudulent, and made a false statement of material fact to a third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Marshall
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-01-22· cited 7×
• In re Hyderally
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-12-20· cited 5×
• In Re Opinion No. 735 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2025-05-22