Skip to main content
· 11/4/2005

In Re Marriage of Wojcik

Citations

  • 838 N.E.2d 282
  • 362 Ill. App. 3d 144
  • 297 Ill. Dec. 795
  • 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1098

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court’s findings of fact were against the manifest weight of the evidence, but affirming the ultimate judgment because the error was harmless
  • concluding that the trial court’s findings of fact were against the manifest weight of the evidence, but affirming the ultimate judgment because the error was harmless
  • reserving the issue of the wife’s right to maintenance was warranted where the husband was presently unable to pay maintenance, but the trial court abused its discretion by indefinitely reserving jurisdiction over the issue
  • “As with other maintenance determinations, a trial court’s decision to reserve jurisdiction on the issue of maintenance will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • discussing the “reserved-jurisdiction” approach to maintenance awards
  • discussing the “reserved-jurisdiction” approach to maintenance awards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.