In Re Marriage of Stockton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the trial court was justified in deviating from the guidelines, but that it abused its discretion by computing child support payments on a ratio of the parties’ incomes
• finding the trial court was justified in deviating from the guidelines, but that it abused its discretion by computing child support payments on a ratio of the parties' incomes
• finding although the trial court’s calculation of the father’s income was erroneous, the error was harmless because the court relied on other evidence to set child - 18 - support below the statutory guidelines
• burden of providing evidence on net income lies with the parties and not with the court
• consider the factors set forth in section 505(a)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).