Skip to main content
· 12/20/1993

In Re Marriage of Smith & Maescher

Citations

  • 21 Cal. App. 4th 100
  • 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 133
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9471
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 16173
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because promisee wife had no legal obligation to pay college expenses of child, her failure to join donee beneficiary child in action against promisor husband precluded recovery of money given to child for education
  • regarding payment of college expenses
  • regarding payment of college expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Work

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.