In Re Marriage of Sanfratello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial court acted reasonably in drawing the inference that the respondent earned substantially more than he claimed
• noting that the trial court acted reasonably in drawing the inference that the respondent earned substantially more than he claimed
• finding the trial court acted reasonably in “drawing the inference that [the father] earned substantially more than his declared income” because the father had not been candid about his business earnings and evidence showed he enjoyed a standard of living exceeding his reported income
• “The [Dissolution Act] does not require the court to place a specific value on each item of property.”
• trial court’s failure to provide a “ ‘specific determination of value’ ” was not an abuse of discretion when husband did not disclose to certified public accountant and trial court “necessary financial documents” needed to evaluate the worth of his three businesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).