Skip to main content
· 12/10/1987

In Re Marriage of Rowden

Citations

  • 516 N.E.2d 1041
  • 163 Ill. App. 3d 869
  • 114 Ill. Dec. 886
  • 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 3717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that husband’s obligation to pay debt was “in the nature of maintenance” and nondischargeable
  • holding the husband’s obligation to pay an automobile loan was in the nature of a property settlement in lieu of maintenance
  • determining, under Illinois law, that husband’s payments on car loan were part of the parties’ property settlement, but, under federal bankruptcy law, the payments were maintenance and not dischargeable
  • determining, under Illinois law, that husband's payments on car loan were part of the parties' property settlement, but, under federal bankruptcy law, the payments were maintenance and not dischargeable
  • “[T]he order that the husband assume the car loan payments was in the nature of a property settlement in lieu of maintenance.”
  • state law “may provide valuable guidance and need not be ignored”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stouder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.