In Re Marriage of Pylawka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the calculation of net income and the issue of whether a substantial change in circumstances has occurred are two distinct questions
• trial court correctly refused to deduct from obligor’s net income any passive activity investment loss arising from his ownership of apartment building
• if the noncustodial parent overwithholds on his W-2, the amount should be added back to his net income when determining his child support under section 505(a) of the Act
• if the noncustodial parent overwithholds on his W-2, the amount should be added back to his net income when determining his child support under section 505(a) of the Act
• trial court correctly refused to deduct from obligor's net income any passive activity investment loss arising from his ownership of apartment building
• if the noncustodial parent overwithholds on his W-2, the amount should be added back to his net income when determining his child support under section 505(a) of the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).