Skip to main content
· 2/10/1992

In Re Marriage of Perlmutter

Citations

  • 587 N.E.2d 609
  • 225 Ill. App. 3d 362
  • 167 Ill. Dec. 340
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating ordinance defining family as a number of related individuals or not more than four unrelated individuals on state due process grounds
  • “the fact that [the husband] could have received a higher salary, as implied by [the wife], does not mean that he was not adequately compensated”
  • “The right of a party to seek a change of venue on the ground of prejudice may be waived if not asserted at the appropriate time.”
  • if husband’s salary is found to be a reasonable compensation for his efforts, the nonmarital business need not reimburse the marital estate because husband’s salary during marriage is marital property
  • if husband’s salary is found to be a reasonable compensation for his efforts, the nonmarital business need not reimburse the marital estate because husband’s salary during marriage is marital property
  • assets acquired after marriage are marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.