In Re Marriage of Mesecher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no privity where \[s]eparate parties claim separate monies\
• holding that there was no privity where “[s]eparate parties claim separate monies”
• no privity between Illinois Department of Public Aid and custodial mother in action for past-due child support
• enforcement proceeding initiated by IDPA did not establish privity of identity, and res judicata principles were inapplicable to subsequent enforcement action by mother
• enforcement proceeding initiated by IDPA did not establish privity of identity, and res judicata principles were inapplicable to subsequent enforcement action by mother

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).