· 12/18/1989
In Re Marriage of Mansell
Citations
- 217 Cal. App. 3d 219
- 265 Cal. Rptr. 227
- 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “Supreme Court’s holding was quite narrow: FUSFSPA does not alter, with regard -to non-disposable retired or retainer pay (including the pay at issue herein
- precluding challenge to distribution SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 194TA 14 of disability pay where husband stipulated to its inclusion in property settlement and declining to reopen and modify settlement
- on remand from Supreme Court, finding that res judicata barred husband’s motion to modify the divorce decree
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ardaiz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.