Skip to main content
· 12/18/1989

In Re Marriage of Mansell

Citations

  • 217 Cal. App. 3d 219
  • 265 Cal. Rptr. 227
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “Supreme Court’s holding was quite narrow: FUSFSPA does not alter, with regard -to non-disposable retired or retainer pay (including the pay at issue herein
  • precluding challenge to distribution SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 194TA 14 of disability pay where husband stipulated to its inclusion in property settlement and declining to reopen and modify settlement
  • on remand from Supreme Court, finding that res judicata barred husband’s motion to modify the divorce decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ardaiz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.