In re Marriage of Kalinawan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State had a trust duty to monitor the federal government’s noncompliance with its lease of public lands but did not have a trust duty to initiate an enforcement action
• holding the state’s duty to protect and preserve trust property includes an ongoing obligation to reasonably monitor a third party’s use of the property
• recognizing “a duty to investigate upon being made aware of evidence of possible damage” to trust property as “a necessary component of [a trustee’s] general duty”
• involving a direct action for breach of public trust against the State for failure to \take all necessary steps to ensure compliance with the terms of [a] lease\
• “The most basic aspect of the State’s trust duties is the obligation ‘to protect and maintain the trust property and regulate its use.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).