Skip to main content
· 5/2/1991

In Re Marriage of Hasso

Citations

  • 229 Cal. App. 3d 1174
  • 280 Cal. Rptr. 919
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 5221
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3227
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no condition precedent where “the agreement” lacked “language that it is ‘subject to’ or ‘conditioned on’” some event
  • finding attorney approval was not condition precedent to enforcement of settlement agreement, despite presence of signature line for attorney
  • contractual provisions not construed as conditions precedent in “absence of language plainly requiring such a construction”
  • “A settlement agreement is in the nature of a contract and is therefore governed by the same legal principles applicable to contracts generally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.