· 5/2/1991
In Re Marriage of Hasso
Citations
- 229 Cal. App. 3d 1174
- 280 Cal. Rptr. 919
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 5221
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3227
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no condition precedent where “the agreement” lacked “language that it is ‘subject to’ or ‘conditioned on’” some event
- finding attorney approval was not condition precedent to enforcement of settlement agreement, despite presence of signature line for attorney
- contractual provisions not construed as conditions precedent in “absence of language plainly requiring such a construction”
- “A settlement agreement is in the nature of a contract and is therefore governed by the same legal principles applicable to contracts generally.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.