Skip to main content
· 7/20/1995

In Re Marriage of Hargrave

Citations

  • 36 Cal. App. 4th 1313
  • 43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 474
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 9759
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5771
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the trial court’s apportionment of delinquent tax liability and concluding that an innocent spouse determination does not preempt state law efforts to impose liability for federal income taxes in a dissolution proceeding
  • interpreting the meaning and purpose of “innocent spouse” designations by the IRS

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.