In Re Marriage of Halas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the issue of fraudulent concealment is necessarily analyzed in the context of the due diligence requirement”
• silence alone is not fraudulent concealment and the issue of fraudulent concealment is necessarily analyzed in the context of the due diligence requirement
• “[consistent with the strong judicial policy favoring final judgments *** a section 2 — 1401 petition is not to be used as a device to *** put in issue matters which have previously been or could have been adjudicated”
• \[c]onsistent with strong judicial policy favoring final judgments *** a section 2- 1401 petition is not to be used as a device to *** put into issue matters which have previously been or could have been adjudicated\
• this restriction reflects “the strong judicial policy favoring finality of judgments”
• no due diligence where the petitioner’s own deposition reflected that she was aware of potential inaccuracies in the representations of the respondent’s net worth when her attorney warned her that the respondent’s handwritten list of assets was incomplete and inaccurate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).