In Re Marriage of Hagshenas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in a situation where both the gift presumption and the marital presumption apply to the property to be classified, the two presumptions cancel each other out, and a simple manifest weight of the evidence standard applies
• noting that in a situation where both the gift presumption and the marital presumption apply to the property to be classified, the two presumptions cancel each other out, and a simple manifest weight of the evidence standard applies
• spouses testified to their opinions as to the value of a business at time of dissolution; issue on appeal was the valuation itself, not timing of valuation
• the expenditure of marital funds by one spouse for necessary, appropriate, and legitimate living expenses when the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown is not considered dissipation
• “the expenditure of marital funds by one spouse for necessary, appropriate and legitimate expenses at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown will not be considered to be dissipation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).