In Re Marriage of Gulla and Kanaval

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that according to the “reciprocal statutory scheme,” the employer “must be penalized according to the law of its state”
• holding that where an appellant failed to provide a transcript of the trial court’s hearing in which it found that it had jurisdiction over the appellant, the reviewing court had to presume that the trial court’s finding was correct
• noting that, without an adequate record preserving the claimed error, the reviewing court must presume that the circuit court’s order had a sufficient factual basis and conforms with the law
• statutory penalty upheld where employer did not begin withholding support payments until almost one year after notice to withhold issued
• statutory penalty upheld where employer did not begin withholding support payments until almost one year after notice to withhold issued
• “[T]he court of review must presume the circuit court’s order had a sufficient factual basis and that it conforms with the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).