In re Marriage of Drysch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the traditional rule–that the financial status of a current spouse should not be considered–”developed because the new spouse has no legal obligation for the support of his stepchildren”
• noting that the traditional rule—that the financial status of a current spouse should not be considered—“developed because the new spouse has no legal obligation for the support of his stepchildren”
• noting that the traditional rule—that the financial status of a current spouse should not be considered—“developed because the new spouse has no legal obligation for the support of his stepchildren”
• discussing the legislature’s use of the term “resources” in section 513 of the Marriage Act “rather than a more narrow term, such as ‘income’ or ‘salary’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).