Skip to main content
· 5/13/2003

In Re Marriage of Crow and Gilmore

Citations

  • 103 S.W.3d 778
  • 2003 WL 21077368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that award of fees in civil contempt proceeding was appealable even though merits of contempt order itself were not final or appealable
  • holding that a party may appeal a ruling in a decision deciding contempt when, unlike in this case, the trial court ruled on issues other than contempt and the issues raised on appeal were not a part of the contempt order
  • collecting cases in which a contemnor purges themselves of contempt by complying with the underlying judgment
  • in response to civil contempt order, contemnors have two options: They may purge contempt by complying with order rendering case moot or may appeal contempt order
  • although contempt and modification were consolidated for purposes of receiving evidence, they were separate for purposes of appeal
  • in response to civil contempt order, contemnors have two options: They may purge contempt by complying with order rendering case moot or may appeal contempt order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duane Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.