In Re Marriage of Connerton and Nevin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not err by declining to include “child care expenses . . . that were speculative and not actually incurred”
• holding that district court did not err by denying the wife’s request for attorney fees where she failed to present evidence as to the reasonableness of her fees at the corresponding hearing on child support modification
• imputing income to mother who was obligee of child supp ort order
• imputing income to mother who was the obligee of child support order
• a request for section 14-10-119 fees should be heard at the time of the hearing on the motion for which they are requested
• District courts “may only consider child care expenses that were actually incurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).