In RE MARRIAGE OF CEPUKENAS v. Cepukenas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Wisconsin court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to modify Virginia support order because order was not registered and because no consent was filed in Virginia as required because petitioner was a Wisconsin resident
• holding Wisconsin court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to modify Virginia support order because order was not registered and because no consent was filed in Virginia as required because petitioner was a Wisconsin resident
• absence of statutory prerequisites for court to order modification of a child support order issued by another state deprived circuit court of competency
• \We must construe statutes so as to not render them meaningless.\
• \We must construe statutes so as to not render them meaningless.\
• \We must construe statutes so as to not render them meaningless.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).