Skip to main content
· 6/6/1986

In Re Marriage of Cannon

Citations

  • 494 N.E.2d 490
  • 112 Ill. 2d 552
  • 98 Ill. Dec. 368
  • 1986 Ill. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the inclusion in an order of a provision for review of maintenance does not render the order unappealable
  • holding that the inclusion in an order of a provision for review of maintenance does not render the order unappealable
  • holding that an order modifying maintenance, but allowing later modification, was final; the modification would affect only subsequent payments, not alter the right to the payments already made
  • dissolution judgment was final and appealable despite trial court’s statement that it intended its maintenance award to “ ‘be reviewable no later than the expiration of two years and sooner if the circumstances of the parties change significantly’ ”
  • dissolution judgment was final and appealable despite -5- 2014 IL App (2d) 131306 trial court’s statement that it intended its maintenance award to “ ‘be reviewable no later than the expiration of two years and sooner if the circumstances of the parties change significantly’ ”
  • dissolution judgment was final and appealable despite -5- 2014 IL App (2d) 131306 trial court’s statement that it intended its maintenance award to “ ‘be reviewable no later than the expiration of two years and sooner if the circumstances of the parties change significantly’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldenhersh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.