In re Marriage of Benink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because [the statute] is . . . divisible, we must apply the modified categorical approach.”
• “We are not bound to accept ‘what in effect was a stipulation on a question of law.’” (quoting U.S. Nat’l Bank, 508 U.S. at 448)
• “We are not bound to accept . . . what in effect was a stipulation on a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).