· 1/26/1999
In Re Marriage of Barneson
Citations
- 81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 726
- 69 Cal. App. 4th 583
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- husband’s written instructions to “transfer” stock into his spouse’s name was not an 11 expression that ownership of the property was being changed
- placement of stock 15 belonging to one spouse in the stock brokerage account of the other spouse was not sufficient 16 to establish a transmutation
- “Transfer is clearly 10 not synonymous with transmutation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.