Skip to main content
· 1/26/1999

In Re Marriage of Barneson

Citations

  • 81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 726
  • 69 Cal. App. 4th 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • husband’s written instructions to “transfer” stock into his spouse’s name was not an 11 expression that ownership of the property was being changed
  • placement of stock 15 belonging to one spouse in the stock brokerage account of the other spouse was not sufficient 16 to establish a transmutation
  • “Transfer is clearly 10 not synonymous with transmutation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.