In RE MARRIAGE OF ANSTUTZ v. Anstutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \waste\ falls under the statutory factor permitting a court to consider each party's contributions to the marriage
• remanding for trial court to consider whether one spouse had depleted the marital assets because of his squandering and neglect and noting the spouse's \problem with alcohol\
• “court’s authority to consider the contribution of each party to the marriage allows it to consider destruction or waste of the marital assets by either party”
• regardless when a marital asset was depleted, the circuit court has the discretion to consider a party's waste of marital assets in departing from the presumption of equal division under Wis. Stat. § 767.255(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).