In Re Marriage of Akins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the statutory language [of Section 1408(c)(4) ] requires some form of affirmative conduct demonstrating express or implied consent to general in-personam jurisdiction”
• stating that \the statutory language [of Section 1408(c)(4) ] requires some form of affirmative conduct demonstrating express or implied consent to general in-personam jurisdiction\
• stating that “[t]he question whether a trial court acquires jurisdiction over a military member’s pension is governed not by state rules of in-person- am jurisdiction or procedure, but rather by the specific terms of the USFSPA”
• noting the FSPA requires some form of affirmative conduct demonstrating consent to general in-personam jurisdiction other than what state procedural rules require

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).