In Re Marks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a contemnor facing incarceration must be informed of his right to counsel and must either waive that right or be provided with court- appointed counsel.”
• “The trial court also went beyond the mandates of [F]amily [C]ode [S]ection 157.163 by informing Marks that he had the constitutional right to remain silent and that he did not have to testify at the hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Re Norris Kinrick Auther Alexis
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2012-12-06
• Stanley, Andria
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-10-22
• in Re: Christopher Glenn Chambers
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-02-12
• in Re Stephanie Dunlap Hadsall
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-02-06
• In Re David Mark Loyd v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2024-06-28

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Occhipenti
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1990-10-04· cited 109×
• Donald A. Ridgway v. T.L. Baker, Potter County Sheriff
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 105×
• Ex Parte Acker
  Texas Supreme Court· 1997-07-09· cited 66×
• Ex Parte Sanchez
  Texas Supreme Court· 1986-02-12· cited 64×
• Ex Parte Dustman
  Texas Supreme Court· 1976-06-09· cited 64×
• In Re Butler
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-04-12· cited 52×
• Ex Parte Gunther
  Texas Supreme Court· 1988-09-21· cited 34×
• Ex Parte Thetford
  Texas Supreme Court· 1963-07-24· cited 29×
• In Re Pruitt
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1999-12-09· cited 24×
• In Re Luebe
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-01-21· cited 12×