In Re Marketing Investors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel failed to notify opposing party he had party’s privileged documents, but just produced documents in response to defendant’s discovery requests
• counsel found to have extensively reviewed privileged documents, based on references in pleadings and intent to use them in litigation
• trial court erred in not disqualifying counsel, as disqualification arose early in litigation, case was not well-developed, and no indication that former employee could not obtain alternate counsel
• attorney’s client took documents from opposing party in violation of employment agreement and gave to his attorney who kept copies and refused to agree not to use documents despite a protective order
• trial court erred in not disqualifying counsel, as disqualification arose relatively early in litigation, case was not well-developed, and there was no indication former employee could not obtain alternate counsel
• counsel’s stated intent to use privileged documents prejudicial and warranted disqualification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).