In Re Marden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[u]ranium is a product of nature, and the appellant is not entitled to a patent on the same, or upon any of the inherent natural qualities of that metal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
  Federal Circuit· 2012-08-16· cited 42×
• Merck & Co., Inc. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation
  Fourth Circuit· 1958-03-03· cited 29×
• Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 18×
• In Re Marden
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1931-03-25· cited 16×
• Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
  S.D. New York· 2010-04-05· cited 12×
• Merck & Co. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.
  W.D. Virginia· 1957-05-03· cited 2×
• In re Allen
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1937-03-29· cited 1×
• Association for Molecular Pathology v. Pto
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-29

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co.
  Third Circuit· 1928-11-23· cited 30×