in Re Marcus Pilkington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “[a]ctual decision of an issue is required to establish the law of the case”
• holding that no obvious conflict existed between level-two jobs and a limitation to one- to three-step instructions
• explaining that an ALJ may properly accept a VE's uncontradicted testimony absent obvious internal conflicts
• explaining that an ALJ may properly accept a VE’s uncontradicted testimony absent obvious internal conflicts
• explaining that an ALJ may properly accept a VE’s uncontradicted testimony absent obvious internal conflicts
• explaining that an ALJ may properly accept a VE’s uncontradicted testimony absent obvious internal conflicts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).