In re Malashia B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that public threat to kill pregnant plaintiff was insufficient to give rise to an IIED claim and noting that “mere threats ... no matter how upsetting, are insufficient to constitute the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress”
• noting, in context of verbal death threat, that “[m]ere threats, annoyance or other petty oppressions, no matter how upsetting, are insufficient to constitute the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress” (citations omitted)
• “mere threats, annoyance or other petty oppressions, no matter how upsetting, are insufficient to constitute the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress”
• threat to kill pregnant plaintiff insufficient to support a cause of action for ITED

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).