Skip to main content
· 12/17/1997

In Re Magno

Citations

  • 216 B.R. 34
  • 1997 WL 812466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting relation back of amended § 523(a)(6) complaint when new claim did not rely on same facts as original § 727(a) complaint
  • rejecting relation back of amended section 523(a)(6) complaint when new claim did not rely on same facts as original section 727(a) complaint
  • “[A]n amendment can only relate back if the new claim relies on the same facts and does not seek to insert new facts.”
  • “the order granting leave to amend was an unappealable, interlocutory order”
  • granting leave to appeal under the Travers standard
  • granting leave to 8 appeal under the Travers standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ollason, Meyers and Hagan, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.