· 12/17/1997
In Re Magno
Citations
- 216 B.R. 34
- 1997 WL 812466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting relation back of amended § 523(a)(6) complaint when new claim did not rely on same facts as original § 727(a) complaint
- rejecting relation back of amended section 523(a)(6) complaint when new claim did not rely on same facts as original section 727(a) complaint
- “[A]n amendment can only relate back if the new claim relies on the same facts and does not seek to insert new facts.”
- “the order granting leave to amend was an unappealable, interlocutory order”
- granting leave to appeal under the Travers standard
- granting leave to 8 appeal under the Travers standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ollason, Meyers and Hagan, Bankruptcy Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.